Barth v. State
156 S.W. 1199, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 749
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of robbery, his punishment being assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. There is nothing in the motion for new trial that can be considered and intelligently reviewed, in the absence of the statement of facts.
The judgment is affirmed.
[1200]*12001
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barth v. State, 156 S.W. 1199, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 749 (Tex. 1913).
156 S.W. 1199 (Barth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.