Barth v. Evans

Missouri Court of Appeals

Barth v. Evans

860 S.W.2d 354, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1100, 1993 WL 265190

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 20, 1993·No. No. 62609·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Husband appeals from the motion court’s order denying his motion to modify that portion of the dissolution decree awarding maintenance. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Husband appeals from the motion court’s order denying his motion to modify that portion of the dissolution decree awarding maintenance. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).

Barth v. Evans, 860 S.W.2d 354, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1100, 1993 WL 265190 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

860 S.W.2d 354 (Barth v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.