Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Barth v. Barth

Barth v. Barth

852 N.E.2d 1211, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1462
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 23, 2006
Docket2006-0896
StatusPublished

This text of 852 N.E.2d 1211 (Barth v. Barth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barth v. Barth, 852 N.E.2d 1211, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1462 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 86473, 2006-0hio-1094. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed April 11, 2006:

“Whether the sixth-month residency requirement for jurisdiction set forth in R.C. 3105.03 is a strict test or may a court examine one party’s intent and the other party’s fraudulent inducement in abandoning Ohio as then' domicile.”

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

The conflict cases are McMaken v. McMaken (1994), 96 Ohio App.3d 402, and Heath v. Heath (Mar. 7, 1997), Lucas App. No. L-96-288.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McMaken v. McMaken
645 N.E.2d 113 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
852 N.E.2d 1211, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barth-v-barth-ohio-2006.