Barth v. Barth
This text of 1998 ND 125 (Barth v. Barth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 6/30/98 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1998 ND 127
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Michael Webb, Defendant and Appellant
Criminal No. 970381
Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable William F. Hodny, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ladd R. Erickson, Assistant State's Attorney, 210-2nd Avenue Northwest, Mandan, ND 58554, for plaintiff and appellee.
Wayne D. Goter, 723 Memorial Highway, P.O. Box 1552, Bismarck, ND 58502-1552, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Webb
[¶1] Michael Webb appealed from the Criminal Judgment and Commitment of the Morton County District Court which was entered upon a plea of guilty for the crime of Conspiracy to Deliver a Controlled Substance (Methamphetamine), a class B felony, in violation of sections 12.1-06-04 and 19-03.1-23, N.D.C.C. Webb argues the district court abused its discretion in sentencing him to a term of imprisonment of eight years. The sentence is affirmed under N.D. R. App. P. 35.1(a)(4). See State v. Steinbach , 1998 ND 18, ¶24, 575 N.W.2d 193 (stating supreme court has no power to review sentence within statutory limits and a sentence within statutory limits will not be set aside unless district court substantially relied on an impermissible factor or factors).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Herbert L. Meschke
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1998 ND 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barth-v-barth-nd-1998.