Barter v. County of Pima

11 P. 62, 2 Ariz. 88, 1886 Ariz. LEXIS 7
CourtArizona Supreme Court
DecidedMay 31, 1886
DocketCivil No. 164
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 11 P. 62 (Barter v. County of Pima) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barter v. County of Pima, 11 P. 62, 2 Ariz. 88, 1886 Ariz. LEXIS 7 (Ark. 1886).

Opinion

PORTER, J.

The cause was tried by the court without intervention of a jury. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. From the judgment, and from an order denying motion [89]*89for new trial, defendant appealed. The evidence as to value of the services for printing the delinquent list, for which this action was brought, varied very materially. It was the province of the judge to determine the value; and it is we1! established that where there is a substantial conflict the judgment will not be reversed on the ground that the evidence does not warrant it. Passim.

Judgment and order denying motion for new trial affirmed.

Shields, C. J., and Baj nes, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prasnikar v. Our Savior's Lutheran Church
79 F. Supp. 3d 1184 (D. Oregon, 2015)
Lloyd Corporation v. Whiffen
773 P.2d 1294 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1989)
Bilderback v. United States
558 F. Supp. 903 (D. Oregon, 1982)
Emblen v. Southern Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
403 P.2d 294 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1965)
Cook v. United States
240 F. Supp. 353 (D. Oregon, 1964)
Buck Witt v. The United States of America
319 F.2d 704 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. White
104 F.2d 923 (Ninth Circuit, 1939)
Dobkins v. Hutton
278 P. 991 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1929)
Newkirk v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.
273 P. 707 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1929)
Smith v. Pallay
279 P. 279 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1929)
Hall v. Hall
259 P. 402 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1927)
City of Bisbee v. Thomas
212 P. 190 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1923)
Brown v. McCloud
190 P. 578 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1920)
Jones Land & Livestock Co. v. Seawell
176 P. 186 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1918)
Scibor v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.
140 P. 629 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1914)
Miles v. Franz Lumber Co.
130 P. 1112 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1913)
Mayhew v. Brislin
108 P. 253 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1910)
Montgomery v. Somers
90 P. 674 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1907)
Pacific Livestock Co. v. Murray
76 P. 1079 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1904)
Willard v. Carrigan
68 P. 538 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 P. 62, 2 Ariz. 88, 1886 Ariz. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barter-v-county-of-pima-ariz-1886.