Barter v. County of Pima

Arizona Supreme Court

Barter v. County of Pima

11 P. 62, 2 Ariz. 88, 1886 Ariz. LEXIS 7

Arizona Supreme Court·Decided May 31, 1886·No. Civil No. 164·Published·Cited by 24 cases

Opinion

PORTER, J.

The cause was tried by the court without intervention of a jury. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. From the judgment, and from an order denying motion [89]*89for new trial, defendant appealed. The evidence as to value of the services for printing the delinquent list, for which this action was brought, varied very materially. It was the province of the judge to determine the value; and it is we1! established that where there is a substantial conflict the judgment will not be reversed on the ground that the evidence does not warrant it. Passim.

Judgment and order denying motion for new trial affirmed.

Shields, C. J., and Baj nes, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PORTER, J.

The cause was tried by the court without intervention of a jury. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. From the judgment, and from an order denying motion [89]*89for new trial, defendant appealed. The evidence as to value of the services for printing the delinquent list, for which this action was brought, varied very materially. It was the province of the judge to determine the value; and it is we1! established that where there is a substantial conflict the judgment will not be reversed on the ground that the evidence does not warrant it. Passim.

Judgment and order denying motion for new trial affirmed.

Shields, C. J., and Baj nes, J., concur.

Barter v. County of Pima, 11 P. 62, 2 Ariz. 88, 1886 Ariz. LEXIS 7 (Ark. 1886).

Pincite

11 P. 62 (Barter v. County of Pima) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related