Bartenfield v. State

131 S.E. 542, 34 Ga. App. 777, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 19
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 12, 1926
Docket16930
StatusPublished

This text of 131 S.E. 542 (Bartenfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bartenfield v. State, 131 S.E. 542, 34 Ga. App. 777, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 19 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence by which the State seeks to connect the accused with the crime charged in the indictment is entirely circumstantial, and is not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 S.E. 542, 34 Ga. App. 777, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartenfield-v-state-gactapp-1926.