Bartell Ranch LLC v. McCullough

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided August 2, 2021·No. 3:21-cv-00080·Unknown

Opinion

Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice ARWYN CARROLL (MA Bar 675926) LEILANI DOKTOR (HI Bar 11201) Natural Resources Section P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 Phone: (202) 305-0465 Fax: (202) 305-0506 arwyn.carroll@usdoj.gov leilani.doktor@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Federal Defendants DISTRICT OF NEVADA BARTELL RANCH, LLC, et al., Case Nos. 3:21-cv-80-MMD-CLB Plaintiffs, and et al., ORDER Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. ESTER M. MCCULLOUGH, et al., Defendants, and LITHIUM NEVADA CORP., Defendant-Intervenor. In order to protect the confidentiality of confidential information obtained by the parties in connection with this case or included in the Administrative Record served by Federal Defendants in this case, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. This Stipulated Protective Order shall govern any record of information produced in this action and designated pursuant to this Stipulated Protective Order, including all designated deposition testimony, all designated testimony taken at a hearing or other proceeding, all designated deposition exhibits, interrogatory answers, admissions, documents and other discovery materials, whether produced informally or in response to interrogatories, requests for admissions, requests for production of documents or other formal methods of discovery. This Stipulated Protective Order shall also govern any designated record of information produced, lodged, or served in this action pursuant to required disclosures under any statute, regulation, federal procedural rule, or local rule of the Court, and any supplementary disclosures thereto, including the Administrative Record served and lodged in this case, and any supplementary disclosures thereto. 2. Definitions a. The term “Confidential Information” shall mean confidential or proprietary technical, scientific, financial, business, health, medical, or personal privacy or identifying information designated as such by the producing party, any non-public information routinely withheld by Federal Defendants or a third party from the public, or information subject to protection under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal law or regulations, or Nevada law. b. For purposes of this Stipulated Protective Order, the United States Bureau of Land Management shall be considered the “Producing Party” of the documents served as part of the Administrative Record in this action and any supplements thereto. 3. Designation of Information a. Documents produced, furnished, lodged, or served during the course of this action shall be designated as containing Confidential Information by including the legend “Confidential” in the margin of each page or each document (whether in paper or electronic form). Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and each page on which confidential information appears shall be so designated. b. A producing party shall designate its discovery responses, responses to requests for admission, documents included in the Administrative Record, briefs, memoranda, and all other papers sent to the court or to opposing counsel as containing Confidential Information when such papers are served or sent. c. A party may designate information disclosed at a deposition as Confidential Information by requesting the reporter to so designate the transcript at the time of the deposition. d. A party shall designate information disclosed at a hearing or trial as Confidential Information by requesting the court, at the time the information is proffered or adduced, to receive the information only in the presence of those persons designated to receive such information and court personnel, and to designate the transcript appropriately. e. In the event that a producing party inadvertently fails to designate any of its information pursuant to paragraphs 3(a)–(d), it may later designate by notifying the receiving parties in writing. The receiving parties shall take reasonable steps to see that the information is thereafter treated in accordance with the designation. 4. Disclosure and Use of Confidential Information a. All Confidential Information produced or exchanged in the course of this case (other than information that is publicly available) shall be used only by the party or parties to whom the information is produced and solely for the purpose of this case. b. Except with the prior written consent of other parties, or upon prior order of this Court obtained upon notice to opposing counsel, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any person other than: i. counsel for the respective parties to this litigation, including in- house counsel and cocounsel retained for this litigation, and clerical, secretarial, and paralegal support staff working under the supervision of such counsel in connection with this action; ii. the Court, Court personnel, and court reporters; iii. any party, officer of a party, or employee of a party, to the extent deemed necessary by counsel for the prosecution or defense of this litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the Certification annexed to this Order as Exhibit A before being shown or given any Confidential Information, which executed copy shall be retained by counsel to the party disclosing the Confidential Information and made available for inspection by opposing counsel during the pendency or after the termination of the action only upon good cause shown and upon order of the Court; iv. consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of this litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the Certification annexed to this Order as Exhibit A before being shown or given any Confidential Information, which executed copy shall be retained by counsel to the party disclosing the Confidential Information and made available for inspection by opposing counsel during the pendency or after the termination of the action only upon good cause shown and upon order of the Court; v. witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(b)(iv)). A witness shall sign the Certification before being shown a document containing Confidential Information. Confidential Information may be disclosed to a witness who will not sign the Certification only in a deposition or court hearing at which the party who designated the Confidential Information is represented. Witnesses shown Confidential Information shall not be allowed to retain copies. c. Any persons receiving Confidential Information shall not reveal or discuss such information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except as set forth herein. d. All documents, including attorney notes and abstracts, that contain information designated by another party as Confidential Information shall be handled as if they were designated pursuant to paragraph 3. e. The terms of this Order do not preclude, limit, restrict, or otherwise apply to the use of documents at trial or any court hearing, provided the proponent of the evidence gives reasonable notice to all counsel and to the Court. Any party may move the Court for an order that the evidence be received in camera or under other conditions to prevent unauthorized disclosure. f. Disclosure of Confidential Information pursuant to this Protective Order shall not be deemed to be a public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, et seq. 5. Filing Confidential Information a. In the event that any receiving party’s briefs, memoranda, exhibits, or other papers of any kind that are served or filed include, discuss, or summarize information designated by another party as Confidential Information the papers must be appropriately designated pursuant to paragraph 3 a

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bartell Ranch LLC v. McCullough, (D. Nev. 2021).

Bartell Ranch LLC v. McCullough (Bartell Ranch LLC v. McCullough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)