Bartelho v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bartelho v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 F. App'x 12
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided July 17, 2001·No. 00-1436·Published

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 00-1436

THOMAS J. BARTELHO,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Respondent, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Torruella, Circuit Judge, Bownes and Stahl, Senior Circuit Judges.

Thomas J. Bartelho on brief pro se. Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, and F. Mark Terison, Senior Litigation Counsel, on brief for appellee.

July 16, 2001 Per Curiam. Thomas J. Bartelho appeals the district court's

judgment denying his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal.

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the district

court's order, dated January 3, 2000.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bartelho v. United States, (1st Cir. 2001).

Bartelho v. United States (Bartelho v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related