Bartee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bartee v. State

741 So. 2d 644, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13208, 1999 WL 817812

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 6, 1999

DocketNo. 98-3243

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 741 So. 2d 644 (Bartee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bartee v. State, 741 So. 2d 644, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13208, 1999 WL 817812 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence following a trial by jury. We remand, however, to the trial court to enter a corrected judgment which reflects that appellant was tried by a jury rather than “entered a plea of nolo contendere to the following crimes.” Appellant need not be present for the trial court to enter a corrected judgment.

Affirmed; Remanded to enter corrected judgment.

POLEN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence following a trial by jury. We remand, however, to the trial court to enter a corrected judgment which reflects that appellant was tried by a jury rather than “entered a plea of nolo contendere to the following crimes.” Appellant need not be present for the trial court to enter a corrected judgment.

Affirmed; Remanded to enter corrected judgment.

POLEN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

741 So. 2d 644, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13208, 1999 WL 817812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartee-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack