Bartee v. State
741 So. 2d 644, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13208, 1999 WL 817812
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 1999·No. No. 98-3243·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence following a trial by jury. We remand, however, to the trial court to enter a corrected judgment which reflects that appellant was tried by a jury rather than “entered a plea of nolo contendere to the following crimes.” Appellant need not be present for the trial court to enter a corrected judgment.
Affirmed; Remanded to enter corrected judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bartee v. State, 741 So. 2d 644, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13208, 1999 WL 817812 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
741 So. 2d 644 (Bartee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
RAFAEL A. CARRION v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
Eutsey v. State
769 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)