Bartal v. Bartal
97 A.D.2d 451, 467 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20040
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 17, 1983·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In a matrimonial action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Walsh, J.), entered May 23, 1983, which denied her motion to, in effect, reargue a prior motion for pendente lite relief. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (Frankel v Frankel, 67 AD2d 719). Although plaintiff denominated her motion as one seeking renewal and reargument, no new facts were presented. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bartal v. Bartal, 97 A.D.2d 451, 467 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).
97 A.D.2d 451 (Bartal v. Bartal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bartal v. Bartal
117 A.D.2d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)