Bartal v. Bartal

97 A.D.2d 451, 467 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20040
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 17, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 A.D.2d 451 (Bartal v. Bartal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bartal v. Bartal, 97 A.D.2d 451, 467 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Walsh, J.), entered May 23, 1983, which denied her motion to, in effect, reargue a prior motion for pendente lite relief. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (Frankel v Frankel, 67 AD2d 719). Although plaintiff denominated her motion as one seeking renewal and reargument, no new facts were presented. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartal v. Bartal
117 A.D.2d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A.D.2d 451, 467 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bartal-v-bartal-nyappdiv-1983.