Barta v. Yeomans
This text of Barta v. Yeomans (Barta v. Yeomans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DALE BARTA, Plaintiff, 8:16-CV-242
VS. NOTICE TAMI YEOMANS, et al., Defendants.
The Court is in receipt of the plaintiff's recently filed statement (filing 41). Because the plaintiff's filing is not recognized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it will not be acted upon by the Court. The plaintiff's filing is not, for instance, a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e): it does not assert manifest errors of law or fact or present newly discovered evidence, see United States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 440 F.3d 930, 934 (8th Cir. 2006), nor was it filed within 28 days of the judgment. Nor does it assert grounds for relief cognizable under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). See Freeman v. Wyeth, 764 F.3d 806, 809 (8th Cir. 2014). And it neither purports to be a notice of appeal, nor was it filed within 30 days of the judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). In sum: this case is closed, and the plaintiff's statement does not require action by the Court.
Dated this 13th day of November, 2019.
BY THE COURT:
hn M. Gerrard hief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barta v. Yeomans, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barta-v-yeomans-ned-2019.