Bart v. Warhus
This text of 56 A.D.2d 736 (Bart v. Warhus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly exercised its discretion in permitting plaintiffs to supplement their bill of particulars. The proposed supplemental bill alleged "headaches” as an additional injury and included special damages and lost wages sustained between the date of the original bill and the date of the proposed supplemental bill. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—bill of particulars.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons and Dillon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 A.D.2d 736, 392 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bart-v-warhus-nyappdiv-1977.