Bart v. Swezy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bart v. Swezy

198 So. 3d 1131, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12800, 2016 WL 4470133

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 24, 2016

DocketNo. 4D15-3968

StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 3d 1131 (Bart v. Swezy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bart v. Swezy, 198 So. 3d 1131, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12800, 2016 WL 4470133 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See. Mullins v. Mullins, 799 So.2d 450, 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (observing that temporary relief awards “are among the areas where trial judges have the very broadest discretion, which appellate .courts are very reluctant to interfere with except under the most compelling of circumstances”) (quoting Pedraja v. Garcia, 667 So.2d 461, 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)); Schmitz v. Schmitz, 891 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

CIKLIN, C.J., GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See. Mullins v. Mullins, 799 So.2d 450, 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (observing that temporary relief awards “are among the areas where trial judges have the very broadest discretion, which appellate .courts are very reluctant to interfere with except under the most compelling of circumstances”) (quoting Pedraja v. Garcia, 667 So.2d 461, 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)); Schmitz v. Schmitz, 891 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

CIKLIN, C.J., GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 So. 3d 1131, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12800, 2016 WL 4470133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bart-v-swezy-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack