Bart v. Swezy
198 So. 3d 1131, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12800, 2016 WL 4470133
Opinion
Affirmed. See. Mullins v. Mullins, 799 So.2d 450, 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (observing that temporary relief awards “are among the areas where trial judges have the very broadest discretion, which appellate .courts are very reluctant to interfere with except under the most compelling of circumstances”) (quoting Pedraja v. Garcia, 667 So.2d 461, 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)); Schmitz v. Schmitz, 891 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bart v. Swezy, 198 So. 3d 1131, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12800, 2016 WL 4470133 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
198 So. 3d 1131 (Bart v. Swezy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pedraja v. Garcia
667 So. 2d 461 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Mullins v. Mullins
799 So. 2d 450 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Schmitz v. Schmitz
891 So. 2d 1140 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)