Bart Thomas Moore v. the State of Texas
This text of Bart Thomas Moore v. the State of Texas (Bart Thomas Moore v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-22-00223-CR __________________
BART THOMAS MOORE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 258th District Court Polk County, Texas Trial Cause No. CR-21-0092 __________________________________________________________________
ORDER
The Court has received one volume of a reporter’s record from court reporter,
Louella Badipour, who also filed a letter stating that “[a]ll other hearings were taken
by the electronic recording device.” The remaining reporter’s record (consisting of
certified copies of the audio storage devices, any designated exhibits, and the log
prepared by the court recorder) in this appeal, due August 31, 2022, has not been
filed. Leona Wiggins, a court recorder, is responsible for preparing, certifying, and
timely filing the remaining reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(b). On
1 September 30, 2022, we informed the court recorder that the record must be filed
within thirty days or the matter would be referred for an enforcement order. The
court recorder failed to file the remaining record by the due date.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the appeal is abated and the cause remanded
to the trial court for a hearing to determine why the remaining reporter’s record has
not been filed. The trial court shall determine whether the appellant has requested
that the reporter’s record be prepared, and whether the party responsible for paying
for the preparation of the remaining reporter’s record has paid the reporter’s fee, or
has made satisfactory arrangements with the reporter to pay the fee, or is entitled to
the reporter’s record without paying the fee. The trial court shall determine why the
court recorder did not timely file the record and may make such orders as shall be
necessary to ensure the remaining reporter’s record is promptly filed. A reporter’s
record shall be made of the hearing and, together with a supplemental clerk’s record
containing any findings or orders of the trial court, shall be filed with the Court of
Appeals by December 19, 2022.
ORDER ENTERED November 17, 2022.
PER CURIAM
Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bart Thomas Moore v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bart-thomas-moore-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.