Barson v. Mulligan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barson v. Mulligan

133 A.D. 44, 117 N.Y.S. 723, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2097

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 18, 1909·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Ingraham, J.:

The effect of the interview between the defendant and one of the . plaintiffs was not before the Court of Appeals when the ease was in that court. I. do not think that, on the testimony as it stands, there was a sufficient consent to entitle, the holder of the mortgage to be treated as a mortgagee in possession,' apjilying. the rule .laid down oil the former appeal by the Court of Appeals (191 N. Y. 306).

The judgment, and order should be affirmed, with costs.

McLaughlin and .¡Scott, JJ., concurred; Laughlin. and Clarke, JJ.„ dissented. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingraham, J.:

The effect of the interview between the defendant and one of the . plaintiffs was not before the Court of Appeals when the ease was in that court. I. do not think that, on the testimony as it stands, there was a sufficient consent to entitle, the holder of the mortgage to be treated as a mortgagee in possession,' apjilying. the rule .laid down oil the former appeal by the Court of Appeals (191 N. Y. 306).

The judgment, and order should be affirmed, with costs.

McLaughlin and .¡Scott, JJ., concurred; Laughlin. and Clarke, JJ.„ dissented. '

Barson v. Mulligan, 133 A.D. 44, 117 N.Y.S. 723, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2097 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

133 A.D. 44 (Barson v. Mulligan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related