Barsky v. Board of Regents
This text of 112 N.E.2d 773 (Barsky v. Board of Regents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied. Motion for a stay pending a direct appeal, or a petition to the Supreme Court of the United States for certiorari, granted. Motion to amend the remittiturs granted by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeals herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Federal Constitution, viz., whether sections 6514 and 6515 of the Education Law, as construed and applied here, are violative of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held that the rights of the petitioners under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States had not been violated or denied. [See 305 N. Y. 89.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 N.E.2d 773, 305 N.Y. 691, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 1231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barsky-v-board-of-regents-ny-1953.