Barshay v. Naithani

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 16, 2023·No. 1:20-cv-08579·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff, -against- 20 CIVIL 8579 (KPF) JUDGMENT MAHESH NAITHANI, Defendant. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 16, 2023, Defendant’s motion to dismiss the SAC is GRANTED. Because (1) Plaintiff has already amended the complaint in this case twice; (i1) Defendant has filed two successful motions to dismiss the operative complaint; and (111) any amendment would be futile, particularly in light of the Release, the Court denies further leave to amend. See, e.g., Bellocchio v. Garland, No. 21 Civ. 3280 (KPF), 2022 WL 2702445, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. July 12, 2022) (collecting cases); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York February 16, 2023

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerkof Court BY: HK. MANGO Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barshay v. Naithani, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Barshay v. Naithani (Barshay v. Naithani) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.