Barshay v. Naithani
This text of Barshay v. Naithani (Barshay v. Naithani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff, -against- 20 CIVIL 8579 (KPF) JUDGMENT MAHESH NAITHANI, Defendant. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 16, 2023, Defendant’s motion to dismiss the SAC is GRANTED. Because (1) Plaintiff has already amended the complaint in this case twice; (i1) Defendant has filed two successful motions to dismiss the operative complaint; and (111) any amendment would be futile, particularly in light of the Release, the Court denies further leave to amend. See, e.g., Bellocchio v. Garland, No. 21 Civ. 3280 (KPF), 2022 WL 2702445, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. July 12, 2022) (collecting cases); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York February 16, 2023
RUBY J. KRAJICK
Clerkof Court BY: HK. MANGO Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barshay v. Naithani, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barshay-v-naithani-nysd-2023.