Barsh v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Barsh v. State

563 S.W.3d 181

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 11, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106276

StatusPublished

This text of 563 S.W.3d 181 (Barsh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barsh v. State, 563 S.W.3d 181 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Araymond Barsh ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his motion for Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing based on alleged errors by Movant's sentencing counsel. Movant pled guilty to two counts *182of the unclassified felony of statutory sodomy in the first degree.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Araymond Barsh ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his motion for Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing based on alleged errors by Movant's sentencing counsel. Movant pled guilty to two counts *182of the unclassified felony of statutory sodomy in the first degree.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

563 S.W.3d 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barsh-v-state-moctapp-2018.