Barse v. Saul
248 U.S. 537, 39 S. Ct. 22
This text of 248 U.S. 537 (Barse v. Saul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Barse v. Saul, 248 U.S. 537, 39 S. Ct. 22 (1918).
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257. (2) Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71: Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley
205 U.S. 225 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Brolan v. United States
236 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Stewart v. City of Kansas
239 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co.
244 U.S. 300 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Bilby v. Stewart
246 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
248 U.S. 537, 39 S. Ct. 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barse-v-saul-scotus-1918.