Barse v. Saul
248 U.S. 537, 39 S. Ct. 22
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257. (2) Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71: Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barse v. Saul, 248 U.S. 537, 39 S. Ct. 22 (1918).
248 U.S. 537 (Barse v. Saul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley
205 U.S. 225 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Brolan v. United States
236 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Stewart v. City of Kansas
239 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co.
244 U.S. 300 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Bilby v. Stewart
246 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1918)