Barry/Dave/Glenn, Inc. v. Salkowitz

181 A.D.2d 754
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 16, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 181 A.D.2d 754 (Barry/Dave/Glenn, Inc. v. Salkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barry/Dave/Glenn, Inc. v. Salkowitz, 181 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for injury to property and loss of business, the defendants Kenneth J. Herman, Inc., and FRP Sheet Metal Contracting Corp. separately appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), entered May 2, 1990, as, after a pretrial conference, granted the plaintiff’s oral application to strike the case from the trial calendar and denied the appellants’ oral applications to preclude the plaintiff from presenting certain evidence at the time of trial and to dismiss the action for the plaintiff’s failure to prosecute, with leave to the appellants to renew those applications on written papers.

[755]*755Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

An appeal to the Appellate Division may be taken as of right from a final or interlocutory judgment (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [1]), or from an order deciding a motion made upon notice (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; see, Delloiaco v City of New York, 174 AD2d 705; Blasie v County of Westchester, 169 AD2d 697; Arslanian v Volkswagen of Am., 121 AD2d 492; Cohalan v Johnson Elec. Constr. Corp., 105 AD2d 770). However, the order appealed from did not decide a motion made upon notice. No application has been made for permission to appeal. In view of the foregoing, the appeals are dismissed (see, CPLR 5701 [c]). In light of this disposition, we do not pass on the merits of the appellants’ arguments. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valerio v. John Doe 1
2021 NY Slip Op 06718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Sherwood v. Roper
237 A.D.2d 275 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
L.R. Dean, Inc. v. International Energy Resources, Inc.
213 A.D.2d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Hartman v. Smith
207 A.D.2d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 A.D.2d 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrydaveglenn-inc-v-salkowitz-nyappdiv-1992.