Home/New York Court of Appeals/Barry v. Town of Glenville

Barry v. Town of Glenville

171 N.E.2d 907, 8 N.Y.2d 1153
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 1, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 171 N.E.2d 907 (Barry v. Town of Glenville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barry v. Town of Glenville, 171 N.E.2d 907, 8 N.Y.2d 1153 (N.Y. 1960).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Regardless of the alleged invalidity of the 1957 amendment purporting to change the districting of the subject property from “ A ” single-family residential to “ C ” multiple dwelling, the testimony indicates failure to comply with the requirements of section 264 of the Town Law regarding posting and publication of the original districting of the area in 1951. For this reason the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, without costs.

Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke concur. Judge Foster taking no part.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Town of Smithtown v. Haynes
278 A.D.2d 312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Beyer v. Burns
150 Misc. 2d 10 (New York Supreme Court, 1991)
Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1977
Benigno v. Cohalan
49 A.D.2d 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 N.E.2d 907, 8 N.Y.2d 1153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barry-v-town-of-glenville-ny-1960.