Barry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Barry v. State

219 S.W.3d 784, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 619, 2007 WL 1120228

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 17, 2007

DocketED 88379

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 S.W.3d 784 (Barry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barry v. State, 219 S.W.3d 784, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 619, 2007 WL 1120228 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Barry (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI