Barry v. Ruskin
135 A. 914, 100 N.J. Eq. 557, 15 Stock. 557, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 657
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the conrt below by Vice-Chancellor Berry.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenci-iard, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barry v. Ruskin, 135 A. 914, 100 N.J. Eq. 557, 15 Stock. 557, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 657 (N.J. 1927).
135 A. 914 (Barry v. Ruskin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stamato v. Agamie
131 A.2d 745 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1957)
Vacca v. Wilkens
154 A. 842 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1931)