Barry v. Peterson

Michigan Supreme Court

Barry v. Peterson

12 N.W. 181, 48 Mich. 263, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 800

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 25, 1882

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 12 N.W. 181 (Barry v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barry v. Peterson, 12 N.W. 181, 48 Mich. 263, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 800 (Mich. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Campbell, J.

Plaintiff sued in a justice’s court to recover for injury caused to his building by rain dripping from defendants’ neighboring house, and by snow thrown between the buildings and on his land from the latter. The chief injury being consequential and not direct, we think there can be no objection to the form of action, which was case.

So far as the damage from snow is concerned there was proof that it was shovelled upon plaintiff’s land from defendants’ house by defendants’ order, and by their servant in the course of his service. We think there was no error in holding defendants liable for this.

But the court did not qualify the liability under all circumstances for the consequences of rain dripping from defendants’ roof, and held it was absolute. This liability does not exist unless it arises from some fault or neglect of duty, and it was so held in Underwood v. Waldron 33 Mich. 239. Eor this error the judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI