Barry v. Murray v. State of Florida
This text of Barry v. Murray v. State of Florida (Barry v. Murray v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
BARRY V. MURRAY, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-1661
[August 27, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Usan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12-011892CF10A.
Barry V. Murray, Blountstown, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lindsay A. Warner, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392, 401 (Fla. 2025), (holding that, even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change in law, it does not apply retroactively to cases that were final when it was decided).
KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barry v. Murray v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barry-v-murray-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.