Barry v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.

22 F. 631
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided July 1, 1884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wallace, J.

This case cannot be distinguished from that of Morgan v. Kansas Pac. Ry. Co. 21 Blatchf. 184, S. C. 15 Fed. Rep. 55, and the question whether the trustee for the bondholders, named in the mortgage, is a necessary party to a suit to compel the mortgagor to apply its net earnings to the payment of the bonds, is therefore not an open one in this court. The demurrer is sustained which alleges a defect of parties. There are no merits in the other grounds of demurrer.

Leave is granted to complainant to amend his bill within 30 days, upon payment of costs of the demurrer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barry v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co., 22 F. 631 (circtsdny 1884).

22 F. 631 (Barry v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Consolidated Water Co. v. City of San Diego
89 F. 272 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California, 1898)