Barry v. Lambert
10 Cal. 503
Opinion
Terry, C. J., concurring.
[504] The appeal, in the present case, is from an order denying the motion of the plaintiff to set aside the statement filed on the application for a new trial, and the proceedings had on such application, and also from an order allowing the defendants to amend their statement. The appeal was taken before the entry of final judgment. The orders were interlocutory, and no appeal lies from such orders, except in the cases provided by statute. They can only be reviewed on appeal from the final judgment.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barry v. Lambert, 10 Cal. 503 (Cal. 1858).
10 Cal. 503 (Barry v. Lambert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Waggener van Meter v. Mondelez International, Inc.
N.D. California, 2025
Waggener van Meter v. Mondelez International, Inc.
N.D. Illinois, 2025
Quivey v. Gambert
32 Cal. 304 (California Supreme Court, 1867)
Ketchum v. Crippen
31 Cal. 365 (California Supreme Court, 1866)
People ex rel. Meminger v. Sexton
24 Cal. 78 (California Supreme Court, 1864)
Meininger v. Gluckauf
1 Cal. Unrep. 113 (California Supreme Court, 1864)