Barry v. Holder
This text of 545 F. App'x 188 (Barry v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Mamadou Alpha Barry, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an [189]*189order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s decision finding Barry ineligible for adjustment of status as an alien who knowingly made a frivolous application for asylum. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the preponderance of the evidence supports the agency’s finding that Barry filed a frivolous asylum application. See Matter of Y-L-, 24 I. & N. Dec. 151, 157 (B.I.A.2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
545 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barry-v-holder-ca4-2013.