Barry v. Gurin

405 A.2d 739, 1979 Me. LEXIS 733
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedSeptember 18, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 405 A.2d 739 (Barry v. Gurin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barry v. Gurin, 405 A.2d 739, 1979 Me. LEXIS 733 (Me. 1979).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered in Superior Court (Sagadahoc County) on a jury verdict for defendant. Plaintiff Herbert Barry, Jr., sued for injuries arising out of a collision between the automobiles driven by him and defendant, alleging that the collision resulted from defendant’s negligence. Herbert’s mother joined as plaintiff seeking to recover her damages related to his injuries. The jury found defendant “not guilty of negligence which was a proximate cause of the accident.” The sole issue on appeal is whether the presiding justice erred in denying plaintiffs’ motion for judgment n. o. v. See Rule 50(b), M.R.Civ.P. On our review of that ruling, “the verdict stands unless manifestly wrong and we take the evidence in the light most favorable to the successful party.” Ogden v. Libby, 159 Me. 485, 485-86, 195 A.2d 414, 414-15 (1963). The evidence was plainly sufficient to warrant the jury’s verdict.

The entry will be:

Appeal denied.

Judgment affirmed.

GLASSMAN, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seiders v. Testa
464 A.2d 933 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
405 A.2d 739, 1979 Me. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barry-v-gurin-me-1979.