Barry v. Compton

26 P.2d 359, 37 N.M. 599
New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided October 23, 1933·No. No. 3916.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WATSON, Chief Justice.

John H. Barry, proprietor of a retail hardware establishment, and W. T. Stalcup, an employee thereof, for themselves and in behalf of others similarly situated, sued to enjoin J. C. Compton, district attorney, and E. B. Eastham, county sheriff, from enforcing Laws 1933, c. 149, limiting the hours of labor of male employees in mercantile establishments.

The defendants demurred to the complaint, and, their demurrer being overruled, refused to plead further, and have appealed from the final judgment awarding the relief prayed for.

There are no contentions of error here other than that the learned trial judge erred in holding the statute unconstitutional. State v. Henry, 37 N. M. 536, 25 P.(2d) 204, is therefore controlling of.this case.

The judgment will be affirmed and the cause remanded. It is so ordered.

SADLER, HUDSPETH, BIOKLEY, and ZINN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barry v. Compton, 26 P.2d 359, 37 N.M. 599 (N.M. 1933).

26 P.2d 359 (Barry v. Compton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Albuquerque v. Burrell
326 P.2d 1088 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1958)