Barry v. Carnival Corp.

257 F. App'x 224
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedDecember 4, 2007
DocketNos. 06-12615, 06-13006
StatusPublished

This text of 257 F. App'x 224 (Barry v. Carnival Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barry v. Carnival Corp., 257 F. App'x 224 (11th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from a district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss based on standing, in an action brought for declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and for injunctive relief pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 57. The plaintiffs, Kathryn Barry and Thomas Leslie, sought a declaration from the district court that defendant Carnival Corporation’s (“Carnival”) forum selection clause, which is on all of Carnival’s ticket contracts is invalid.

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs and having the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s judgment of dismissal based on issue preclusion. See Christo v. Padgett, 228 F.3d 1324, 1339-40 (11th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Creation of remedy
28 U.S.C. § 2201

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 F. App'x 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barry-v-carnival-corp-ca11-2007.