Barry v. American Home Assurance Co.
289 N.E.2d 180, 31 N.Y.2d 684, 337 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1071
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs (see Silver v. Great Amer. Ins. Co., 29 N Y 2d 356). The defendant-respondent has stipulated — through counsel — that it will accept service of process in either Pennsylvania or Delaware, if the plaintiff elects to bring suit in one or the other of those jurisdictions, and that it will waive any defense based upon the Statute of Limitations.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barry v. American Home Assurance Co., 289 N.E.2d 180, 31 N.Y.2d 684, 337 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1071 (N.Y. 1972).
289 N.E.2d 180 (Barry v. American Home Assurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crowley v. Guardsmark, Inc.
64 A.D.2d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Melville v. American Home Assurance Co.
443 F. Supp. 1064 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1977)