Barry v. American Home Assurance Co.

289 N.E.2d 180, 31 N.Y.2d 684, 337 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1071
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 5, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 289 N.E.2d 180 (Barry v. American Home Assurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barry v. American Home Assurance Co., 289 N.E.2d 180, 31 N.Y.2d 684, 337 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1071 (N.Y. 1972).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs (see Silver v. Great Amer. Ins. Co., 29 N Y 2d 356). The defendant-respondent has stipulated — through counsel — that it will accept service of process in either Pennsylvania or Delaware, if the plaintiff elects to bring suit in one or the other of those jurisdictions, and that it will waive any defense based upon the Statute of Limitations.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crowley v. Guardsmark, Inc.
64 A.D.2d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Melville v. American Home Assurance Co.
443 F. Supp. 1064 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 N.E.2d 180, 31 N.Y.2d 684, 337 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barry-v-american-home-assurance-co-ny-1972.