Barry Pizzo v. State
This text of Barry Pizzo v. State (Barry Pizzo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00701-CR
Barry Pizzo, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR-2013-146, HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Appellant’s brief was originally due April 10, 2015. After multiple motions
requesting an extension of time to file his brief, the appeal was abated and remanded to the trial court
in January 2016 to determine whether appellant desired to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether
counsel had abandoned this appeal. The case was reinstated on July 13, 2016, and appellant’s brief
was due on August 12, 2016. On August 29, 2016, appellant’s counsel, E. Chevo Pastrano, filed
another motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief, requesting an extension until
September 6, 2016.
We grant appellant’s motion. No further extensions, however, will be granted.
Appellant’s counsel is ordered to tender a brief in this cause no later than September 6, 2016.
Failure to file a brief by that date will result in counsel being called before this Court to show cause
why he should not be held in contempt for violating this order. It is ordered on August 31, 2016.
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Bourland
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barry Pizzo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barry-pizzo-v-state-texapp-2016.