Barry McIntosh v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Department of Corrections
This text of Barry McIntosh v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Department of Corrections (Barry McIntosh v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D20-599 _____________________________
BARRY MCINTOSH,
Petitioner,
v.
MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Department of Corrections,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
September 22, 2021
PER CURIAM.
The Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari on the merits. See Topps v. State, 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that “clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits” is deemed a decision “which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel”).
LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Barry McIntosh, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gecelyne S. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Barry McIntosh v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barry-mcintosh-v-mark-s-inch-secretary-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2021.