Barry Lewis Andrews v. State
Opinion
Opinion issued November 26, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00436-CR NO. 01-13-00437-CR ——————————— BARRY LEWIS ANDREWS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 263rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case Nos. 1339349, 1339350
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Barry Lewis Andrews, has filed a pro se notarized “Request to
Withdraw Appeal,” stating that he “do[es] not wish to further prosecute this appeal
and request[ing] that the notice of appeal be withdrawn.” Further, in a hearing before the trial court on November 6, 2013, appellant stated on the record in open
court that he wished for his appeal to be dismissed.
The Court construes the document filed by appellant as a motion to dismiss
the appeal. Although appellant’s motion to dismiss is only signed by appellant,
counsel for appellant previously filed a motion to dismiss appellant’s appeal that
contained counsel’s signature. Thus, construing the two motions together, we find
that appellant has complied with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in the appeal.
Accordingly, we lift the abatement ordered by this Court on October 31,
2013, reinstate the appeal, and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). To
the extent that appellant requests in his motion to dismiss that this Court transfer
appellant to the Texas Department of Corrections, this request is denied. We
dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Massengale.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barry Lewis Andrews v. State (Barry Lewis Andrews v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.