Barry Lane Carey v. Patti L. Huffman Bob Robertson Doctor Walker Doctor Sprague Wimpy Hylton Junior Hagy Bob Newberry Vince W. Wolfe

Fourth Circuit

Barry Lane Carey v. Patti L. Huffman Bob Robertson Doctor Walker Doctor Sprague Wimpy Hylton Junior Hagy Bob Newberry Vince W. Wolfe

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11005, 1995 WL 88938

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 6, 1995

Docket94-6671

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1215 (Barry Lane Carey v. Patti L. Huffman Bob Robertson Doctor Walker Doctor Sprague Wimpy Hylton Junior Hagy Bob Newberry Vince W. Wolfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barry Lane Carey v. Patti L. Huffman Bob Robertson Doctor Walker Doctor Sprague Wimpy Hylton Junior Hagy Bob Newberry Vince W. Wolfe, 48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11005, 1995 WL 88938 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Barry Lane CAREY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Patti L. HUFFMAN; Bob Robertson; Doctor Walker; Doctor
Sprague; Wimpy Hylton; Junior Hagy; Bob
Newberry; Vince W. Wolfe, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6671.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 6, 1995.

Barry Lane Carey, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA; George W. Wooten, Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.* Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Carey v. Huffman, No. CA-93-396 (W.D.Va. May 31, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636 (West 1993)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Barry Lane CAREY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Patti L. HUFFMAN; Bob Robertson; Doctor Walker; Doctor
Sprague; Wimpy Hylton; Junior Hagy; Bob
Newberry; Vince W. Wolfe, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6671.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 6, 1995.

Barry Lane Carey, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA; George W. Wooten, Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.* Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Carey v. Huffman, No. CA-93-396 (W.D.Va. May 31, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636 (West 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11005, 1995 WL 88938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barry-lane-carey-v-patti-l-huffman-bob-robertson-d-ca4-1995.