Barry L. Joachim, D/B/A Lubbock Motor Speedway v. Jimmy D. King

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 31, 2002
Docket07-01-00383-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Barry L. Joachim, D/B/A Lubbock Motor Speedway v. Jimmy D. King (Barry L. Joachim, D/B/A Lubbock Motor Speedway v. Jimmy D. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barry L. Joachim, D/B/A Lubbock Motor Speedway v. Jimmy D. King, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

NO. 07-01-0383-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

MAY 31, 2002

______________________________

BARRY L. JOACHIM, D/B/A LUBBOCK MOTOR SPEEDWAY, APPELLANT

V.

DORIS KING, INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE

OF JIMMY D. KING, DECEASED, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 364 TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 99-508,360; HONORABLE BRADLEY UNDERWOOD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

Appellant Barry L. Joachim, d/b/a Lubbock Motor Speedway, appealed from a take-nothing summary judgment in his lawsuit for breach of a non-competition clause in a purchase contract, for tortious interference with his clients and the operation of his race track.  The clerk’s record was filed on February 22, 2002, and appellant previously informed this court that no reporter’s record would be requested.  That being so, appellant’s brief was due to be filed on March 25, 2002.  

To date, we have not received appellant’s brief or a motion for extension of time to file one.  By letter dated May 16, 2002, we informed appellant that his brief had not been timely filed and, unless a response was received by May 28, 2002, reasonably explaining his failure, together with a showing that appellee had not been significantly injured due to such failure, the appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8 (a)(1).   No response to that letter has been received.

Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed.  

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Barry L. Joachim, D/B/A Lubbock Motor Speedway v. Jimmy D. King, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barry-l-joachim-dba-lubbock-motor-speedway-v-jimmy-texapp-2002.