Barry Dwayne Minnfee v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 16, 2008
Docket07-08-00147-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Barry Dwayne Minnfee v. State (Barry Dwayne Minnfee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barry Dwayne Minnfee v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NO. 07-08-0147-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL B


APRIL 16, 2008

______________________________


BARRY DWAYNE MINNFEE,


Appellant

v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS,


Appellee

_________________________________


FROM THE 320th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;



NO. 49,678-D; HONORABLE DON R. EMERSON, JUDGE

________________________________



Memorandum Opinion

_________________________________



Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.



Before the court is a document filed by Barry Dwayne Minnfee. Though entitled "notice of appeal," among other things, the writing fails to disclose the judgment or final order from which he appeals. Instead, Minnfee seems to be asking that we review his request to preserve "evidence containing biological material." However, the trial court has yet to execute a final order addressing the matter. Since the existence of such an order or judgment is a prerequisite to our exercising jurisdiction, see Verdin v. State, 13 S.W.3d 121, 122-23 (Tex. App.-Tyler 2000, no pet.) (requiring a final appealable order or an appealable interlocutory order by the trial court for jurisdiction), we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.



Per Curiam

Do not publish.

3 L. Ed. 2d 821, 828 (1985) (holding that indigent defendant is entitled to the effective assistance of counsel on the first appeal as a matter of right and that counsel must be available to assist in preparing and submitting an appellate brief).

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2).



We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to pursue this appeal and has been denied effective assistance of counsel, then we further direct the court to appoint new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal. The name, address, phone number, fax number and state bar number of the new counsel who will represent appellant on appeal must also be included in the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be developed (1) a supplemental clerk's record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and (2) a supplemental reporter's record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the hearing. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk's record and the supplemental reporter's record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before July 22, 2005. Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request additional time before July 22, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verdin v. State
13 S.W.3d 121 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Barry Dwayne Minnfee v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barry-dwayne-minnfee-v-state-texapp-2008.