Barry Bluefeld v. Barry Cohen
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2386
BARRY J. BLUEFELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BARRY S. COHEN; JOEL S. MEISEL; DAVID COHEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:15-cv- 02857-PX)
Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 27, 2017
Amended: April 5, 2017
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry J. Bluefeld, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew D. Matkov, SALTZ MATKOV PC, Wayne, Pennsylvania; Albert Sanford Nalibotsky, SALTZ MATKOV, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Barry J. Bluefeld seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders: (1) denying his motion for leave to file a second
amended complaint; (2) denying his motion for an extension of
time, and (3) granting the Appellees’ motion for a
confidentiality order. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Bluefeld seeks to appeal
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barry Bluefeld v. Barry Cohen (Barry Bluefeld v. Barry Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.