Barrow v. State

105 S.W.2d 664, 132 Tex. Crim. 484, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 298
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 24, 1937
DocketNo. 18829.
StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.W.2d 664 (Barrow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barrow v. State, 105 S.W.2d 664, 132 Tex. Crim. 484, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 298 (Tex. 1937).

Opinions

HAWKINS, Judge.

— Conviction is for forgery, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

The record contains no statement of facts. Ten bills of exception are brought forward in the transcript. They all relate to matters which make it impossible to appraise the bills in the absence of the facts developed on the trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.W.2d 664, 132 Tex. Crim. 484, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrow-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.