Barrow v. State

138 S.W. 109, 62 Tex. Crim. 423, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 298
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barrow v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 Tex. Crim. 549
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 24, 1911·No. No. 1227.·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

Appellant was tried and convicted, in the Justice Court of precinct No. 8 of Denton County, Texas, on October 20. 1910, of a simple assault and filed $5.

Seventy-six days thereafter he filed an appeal bond, and attempted to appeal the case to the County Court. In the County Court the county attorney made a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal bond was insufficient in that it does not bind the defendant to appear at any particular place. Upon the authority of Russell v. State, 84 S. W. Rep., 589, this motion was properly sustained, and the case properly dismissed from the County Court. The *424 appeal bond in the Russell case, supra, is precisely, in this respect, the same as the bond in this case.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barrow v. State, 138 S.W. 109, 62 Tex. Crim. 423, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 298 (Tex. 1911).

138 S.W. 109 (Barrow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beverly v. State
84 S.W. 589 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1905)