Barrow v. Sadler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barrow v. Sadler

108 A.D.2d 608, 485 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42965

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 108 A.D.2d 608 (Barrow v. Sadler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barrow v. Sadler, 108 A.D.2d 608, 485 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42965 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Callahan, J.), entered on December 16, 1983, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs and without disbursements, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the judgment in her favor to $200,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

Upon our review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated.

The appeal from the denial of the motion to set aside the partial judgment after trial is dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the aforesaid judgment. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Bloom, Fein and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Callahan, J.), entered on December 16, 1983, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs and without disbursements, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the judgment in her favor to $200,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

Upon our review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated.

The appeal from the denial of the motion to set aside the partial judgment after trial is dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the aforesaid judgment. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Bloom, Fein and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 A.D.2d 608, 485 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrow-v-sadler-nyappdiv-1985.