Barrow v. Pagles

6 Ala. 462
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1844
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Ala. 462 (Barrow v. Pagles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barrow v. Pagles, 6 Ala. 462 (Ala. 1844).

Opinion

ORMOND, J.

Tlrs case is, in all respects, libe the one between the same parties, [p. 432.] except that it is not alleged that the affirmance of the judgment by the supreme court appears, by the cert ficate of the clerk. But the omission of prout patet per record,urn, can only be taken advantage of, by special demurrer; [1 duty’s Plead.ngs, 358;] and as by our statute, all special demurrers are to have only the effect of general demurrers, it results that the om.ss.on cannot be taken advantage of. Nor can any injury poss.bly result from this view, inasmuch as it will always be in the power of the defendant, by the plea of nul tiel record, to put the plaint,if on proof that there is such a record remaining in the court, out of which the scire facias issues.

Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nance v. Coxe
16 Ala. 125 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1849)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Ala. 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrow-v-pagles-ala-1844.