Barrow v. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.

243 A.D. 586

This text of 243 A.D. 586 (Barrow v. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barrow v. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co., 243 A.D. 586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The proofs adduced on the trial were sufficient upon which to predicate liability in negligence, and, therefore, the complaint should not have been dismissed. The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the verdict rendered in favor of the appellant should be reinstated.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and the verdict reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrow-v-forty-second-street-manhattanville-st-nicholas-avenue-railway-nyappdiv-1935.