Barrow v. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barrow v. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.

243 A.D. 586

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The proofs adduced on the trial were sufficient upon which to predicate liability in negligence, and, therefore, the complaint should not have been dismissed. The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the verdict rendered in favor of the appellant should be reinstated.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and the verdict reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The proofs adduced on the trial were sufficient upon which to predicate liability in negligence, and, therefore, the complaint should not have been dismissed. The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the verdict rendered in favor of the appellant should be reinstated.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and the verdict reinstated.

Barrow v. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co., 243 A.D. 586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 586 (Barrow v. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.