Barrow v. Darden

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Barrow v. Darden

151 A.2d 199, 1959 D.C. App. LEXIS 356

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 1959·No. No. 2336·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued his two former partners for money alleged to he due him. After a lengthy trial without a jury the trial court found that appellant had received from the partnership all the money to which he was entitled except the sum of $18.10, and awarded him judgment for that amount. He has appealed, claiming that he should have been awarded a larger amount. Our examination of the record reveals no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued his two former partners for money alleged to he due him. After a lengthy trial without a jury the trial court found that appellant had received from the partnership all the money to which he was entitled except the sum of $18.10, and awarded him judgment for that amount. He has appealed, claiming that he should have been awarded a larger amount. Our examination of the record reveals no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Barrow v. Darden, 151 A.2d 199, 1959 D.C. App. LEXIS 356 (D.C. 1959).

Pincite

151 A.2d 199 (Barrow v. Darden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.