Barrow v. City of Bessemer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Barrow v. City of Bessemer

138 So. 553, 224 Ala. 48, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 26

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedDecember 17, 1931

Docket6 Div. 56.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 So. 553 (Barrow v. City of Bessemer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barrow v. City of Bessemer, 138 So. 553, 224 Ala. 48, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 26 (Ala. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, J.

The ordinance under which Barrow was prosecuted levies a license tax against persons, firms, or corporations engaged in the business of manufacturing or bottling soft drinks, or their agents, within the corporate limits of the city of Bessemer, using the method of bottling as a basis for classification.

Applying the rule of strict construction, it is clear that selling and delivering the product is not within the purview of the ordinance. This differentiates this case from Town of Guntersville v. Wright, 223 Ala. 349, 135 So. 634, and the cases therein cited.

On the facts stated by the Court of Appeals in its opinion, the ease was properly disposed of by that court, and the writ of certiorari is due to be denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI