Barrow v. Blasingame
57 S.E. 926, 1 Ga. App. 358, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 243
Opinion
1. A promissory note must contain words of negotiability, in order to entitle tlie transferee thereof to the rights accorded by the law to bona Me purchasers of negotiable paper. Reed v. Murphy, 1 Ga. 236; Cohen v. Prater, 56 Ga. 204; Third National Bank v. W. & A. R. Co., 114 Ga. 890.
2. As to its other substantial features, this ease is controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Jones v. Gilbert, 93 Ga. 604.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barrow v. Blasingame, 57 S.E. 926, 1 Ga. App. 358, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 243 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).
57 S.E. 926 (Barrow v. Blasingame) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reed ex rel. Holley v. Murphy
1 Ga. 236 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1846)
Jones v. Gilbert
20 S.E. 48 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)
Third National Bank v. Western & Atlantic Railroad
40 S.E. 1016 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)