Barrow v. . Barrow
This text of 14 S.E.2d 514 (Barrow v. . Barrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court having found, upon competent evidence, that the defendant in good faith denied the allegations of the complaint, was unable to defend the action or prosecute her cross action and adequately meet other expenses, that the plaintiff is financially able to pay allowances for her support and counsel fees, and (for the purposes of defendant’s motion) the facts alleged in the answer and affidavits filed in support of the motion were true, there was no error in entering the order, from which appeal is taken. Vaughan v. Vaughan, 211 N. C., 354, 190 S. E., 492; Holloway v. Holloway, 214 N. C., 662, 200 S. E., 436.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 S.E.2d 514, 219 N.C. 544, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrow-v-barrow-nc-1941.