Barrow v. Barrow
This text of 78 S.E. 123 (Barrow v. Barrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a bill of exceptions complains of a judgment allowing temporary alimony and counsel fees, and it appears therefrom that the evidence submitted upon the hearing consisted only of affidavits made by named persons, some in' behalf of the petitioner and some for the respondent, and such evidence is neither incorporated in the bill nor referred to therein and attached thereto as an exhibit properly authenticated, and no brief of the evidence has been approved and filed so as to become a part of the record, but such documentary evidence is merely specified by the excepting party as a part of the record to be sent up to this court by the clerk of the trial court, the judgment will be affirmed, as without such evidence this court can not determine the question whether the judge erred in rendering the judgment complained [807]*807of; and such affidavits, not being a part of the record in the ease, can not be specified and sent to this court as such. Silvey v. Brown, 137 Ga. 104 (72 S. E. 907).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 S.E. 123, 139 Ga. 806, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrow-v-barrow-ga-1913.