Barros v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Barros v. State

929 So. 2d 57, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7242, 2006 WL 1289149

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 12, 2006

DocketNo. 5D05-4243

StatusPublished

This text of 929 So. 2d 57 (Barros v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barros v. State, 929 So. 2d 57, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7242, 2006 WL 1289149 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Hugo Q. Barros appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. As to grounds two and three, we affirm without further comment. As to ground one, we reverse for a hearing as the allegations, if true, would demonstrate that counsel “entirely fail[ed] to subject the prosecution’s case to meaningful adversarial testing,” resulting in the presumption of prejudice. U.S. v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 659, 104 S.Ct. 2039, 80 L.Ed.2d 657 (1984); Dillbeck v. State, 882 So.2d 969 (Fla.2004). .

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

SAWAYA, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Hugo Q. Barros appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. As to grounds two and three, we affirm without further comment. As to ground one, we reverse for a hearing as the allegations, if true, would demonstrate that counsel “entirely fail[ed] to subject the prosecution’s case to meaningful adversarial testing,” resulting in the presumption of prejudice. U.S. v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 659, 104 S.Ct. 2039, 80 L.Ed.2d 657 (1984); Dillbeck v. State, 882 So.2d 969 (Fla.2004). .

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

SAWAYA, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

929 So. 2d 57, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7242, 2006 WL 1289149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barros-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack